Solved
Forum Discussion
Guillaume_Roman
Mar 26, 2015Cirrus
Hello,
I agree with you, if I have 2 pools and 2 nodes I expect to have 4 results, but passing 2 nodes was a workaround to have the results of the node1 within the 2 pools.
So if I have this configuration:
-
pool1:
- node1
- node2
-
pool2:
- node1
- node3
And I want to get status of pool1/node1, pool1/node2, pool2/node1, pool2/node3, I don't know how to get this 4 results with the syntaxe of get_member_monitor_status.
At this time I loop over my node/pool to perform one request per expected result.
By the way, I'm alone in a testing environment and I can assure you I'm not changing the state of nodes beetween tests :p