Both iRules look like they have the same condition and similar outcomes; site no longer exists and then attempts to redirect. The first create a dialogue box via javascript, but doesn't look like it redirects to a different site just reloads the current page over and over. The second displays the message on the page and redirects automatically after 2 seconds using a meta refresh. These probably shouldn't be combined. You should decide which strategy to use and go with one of the two. However, below is a stab at combining the two if you really wanted to which creates a pop-up alert that when closed allows the meta refresh in the HTML to redirect.
if { [HTTP::host] equals "192.168.210.1" and [HTTP::uri] starts_with "/sasi" and ![HTTP::cookie exists "warning"]} {
HTTP::respond 200 content {
Warning
The site www.foods.com has been retired.
After 5 seconds, you will automatically be redirected to our new page at www.drinks.com
} "Set-Cookie" "warning=1"
}
}