Forum Discussion
Hello there,
I want to do the opposite, as described here:
https://devcentral.f5.com/questions/how-to-reduce-health-monitor-interval-when-pool-member-is-downanswer88455
Eseentially, I want my up interval to always be 5s, with a [down] interval of 30s. The timeout would be unchanged I guess? However, I should note that, in this config, the standard timeout to interval ratio (3n+1) is violated, since in reality, the typical interval can be thought of as the 'up interval' rather than the actual 'interval' field; and this'interval' value (in my case, 30s) would only ever be enforced if the pool member is down.
Is this logic sound and, if so, I guess I can give it a go in our Test environment? Just wanted to hear what you guys had to say about it before I just plug and play!
Thanks! B