Load Balancing with Predictive (member)

Thanks for the reply.  That shows me the persistance records, which isn't what I'm looking for. 

I'm wanting to see the performance numbers the F5 is calculating for each server.  That way I can tell management "more traffic should be going to server X because he has the best performace calcuation currently".  

Right now if managment asks why all the traffic is going to server X the best I can do is guess and hint vaguely at F5 black magic.  This is insufficent resoning to management.  I really want a concreet way that I can show from a stastic on the F5 that says "server X has a current performance of <insert number or stat or whatever> vs server Y that has a current performance of <instert number or stat or whatever>, and server Z has a performance of <insert number or stat or whatever> and based off of those numbers the F5 will be sending a majority of traffic to server <insert best performing server based off the predictive stats here>"

Correct, and from the information I'm seeing there, they are not balancing correctly.  Which is why I wanted to see whatever metric the Predictive Member was using to do the balancing.  I've switched it off of Predictive Member onto Round Robin to remove the magic metric variable and I'm seeing that the connections tend to still all go to the same server, so I know it's not balancing correctly.  I've opened a ticket with support.

Yes, thank you.  I'm aware of the different methods.  I have suspicisions that our VPN solution, zscaler, is preventing the load balacing from working correctly because the BigIP sees all VPN traffic as coming from the same IPs.  I've opened a ticket with support.