Forum Discussion

Matthias_Ubben_'s avatar
Matthias_Ubben_
Icon for Nimbostratus rankNimbostratus
May 30, 2014

SNAT problem, caused by oneconnect?

Is there a known problem with oneconnect and SNAT iRules?

I have to set a special SNAT adress for requests from some special users.

The iRule looks like this:

when CLIENT_ACCEPTED {         
  switch [IP::client_addr] { 
    ??.??.??.??/?? {
      snatpool SNAT_PENTESTER
    } 
    default {
       Default usage of SNAT Automap
      snat automap 
    } 
  } 
}

This works sometimes, sometimes not. We didn't found a reason, why the LTM sometimes uses the SNAT iRule and sometimes not. The VS uses a oneconnect profile. Could this be a reason for this confusing reaction?

Any help welcome!

22 Replies

  • Thanks a lot to all, especially mimlo and nitass!

     

    I'll ask my service provider and the service provider will ask the F5 support ...

     

    If F5 confirms this expectation, I'll inform you soon.