bilsch_10068
Feb 10, 2011Nimbostratus
pools/sub-pools on the ltm
I am working on a configuration using the LTM to load balance across a number of jboss app servers and am curious if there is a way to have a single pool comprise multiple sub pools without the use of an irule. Say you have the following setup:
A: 10.10.10.1:8080 , 10.10.10.2:8080 , 10.10.10.3:8080 , 10.10.10.4:8080 , 10.10.10.5:8080
B: 10.10.10.1:8180 , 10.10.10.2:8180 , 10.10.10.3:8180 , 10.10.10.4:8180 , 10.10.10.5:8180
C: 10.10.10.1:8280 , 10.10.10.2:8280 , 10.10.10.3:8280 , 10.10.10.4:8280 , 10.10.10.5:8280
D: 10.10.10.1:8380 , 10.10.10.3:8380 , 10.10.10.3:8380 , 10.10.10.4:8380 , 10.10.10.5:8380
Is it possible, in the same pool definition, to build a pool which comprises members of A-D balancing evenly across and preserv ing recovery within the same group. EG, if a node in A goes down,
1) Initial traffic assuming all is well users would be round-robin across members in groups A-D
2) sessions in group A will be re-distributed across nodes only in group A
3) Optionally recovering to groups B-D if none are available in group A.
( forgive if this is a re-post - firefox/noscript and devcentral don't get along )