Route Domains, strict isolation and parent
Hi,
I wonder if my understanding (based on Working with Route Domains) of Strict Isolation (SI) and Parent settings is correct.
Scenario:
-
RD0 - default in Common, SI enabled
-
RD1 - (in Common) SI Enbled, Parent set to 0
-
RD2 - (in Common) SI Enbled, Parent set to None
-
VS created in RD0 (VIP), pool members from both RD0 and RD1 - traffic should be forwarded to both pool members because of Parent/Child relationship
-
VS created in RD2 (VIP%2) - pool members from both RD0 and RD2 - traffic should not be forwarded to member from RD0 because there is no Parent/Child relationship
-
VS created in RD1 (VIP%1) - pool members from both RD1 and RD2 - traffic should not be forwarded to member from RD2 because there is no Parent/Child relationship and SI is enabled, in case SI would be enabled on both RD1 and RD2 traffic should be forwarded to both pool members
Is above correct? If there is Parent/Child relationship SI setting can be enabled and still traffic will be routed between RDs?
Piotr