Forum Discussion
4 Replies
- Samir_Jha_52506Noctilucent
Please explain your requirement. Requirement can be achieved via iule.
- ldrolezNimbostratus
- Yes it can be achieved via an iRule but for performance reasons we'd like to avoid this
- We know that LTM supports X-Forwarded-For, but this is not a standard
- RFC7239 "Forwarded:" headers is now a standard, but it's not supported natively by F5
So that was a simple questions: Is there anything planned to support natively this standard? :)
Hi Idrolez,
You may open a ticket and ask the F5 support to get sure and/or raise the importance-meter of this feature request. In any case please post the answer back here, so that other peers will get that information too... ;-)
Thanks and Cheers, Kai
- MR_RJCirrus
Latest update, today, from F5 regarding native support; "Consulting PD, there is an RFE for this, but currently there is no target version to officially add native support for RFC7239 in HTTP profile."
Looks like F5 is spreading a bit thin due to so many products these days, the base-platform doesnt get the attention that their customers require.
I can recommend the iRule to get this working until F5, some year, might add this to the http profile. https://devcentral.f5.com/codeshare/http-forwarded-header-injection-1083